I appreciate your comments and perspective. My point (which I obscured by being too wordy) was really about the advisability leaving essentially gutted threads on a forum that may distract and/or frustrate others versus having a policy that encourages participants to not post images they may feel compelled to delete later. It's an administrative issue.

Regarding the image in question - it's not that I don't 'get' what others find so 'special' about it - nor is this one of those issues that boils down to taste alone, as you suggest. My observation is just that - and not an opinion. The goats (and isn't this one of the challenges in wildlife photography) are reacting to the human presence - they are looking at the photographer. While the backdrop is stunning, access may have been difficult and good fortune planted wildlife in the scene, it's still a scene showing animals looking at people.

Certainly there are exceptions but where wildlife in their natural surroundings are concerned, would anyone really disagree that images of wild animals doing what they do in the wild are far more compelling than images of wild animals looking at the photographer who is looking at them? It is my observation that this is the one thing that could elevate what is already a very good image into the 'great' category. That you would respond to my observation, as you did above, with "It is ok you dont get what I or others find so special about the picture" is frankly laughable.