female goldeneyes
#13808
03/12/08 11:15 AM
03/12/08 11:15 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Canada
JimPearce
OP
Wanderer
|
OP
Wanderer
Joined: Mar 2008
Canada
|
|
|
|
Re: thanks James.
[Re: James Morrissey]
#13812
03/12/08 04:27 PM
03/12/08 04:27 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Montana
Tony Bynum
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2005
Montana
|
the images are very well done. sharp, and good color. they are documentary style. the last one has some "action" but generally, i believe, the best wildlife photos are ones that tell us something more about the creature. static shots are great for bird books, but to me wildlife images must show emotion, have energy, or evoke some deeper feeling. Your shots as I said are well done. The one reason I dont shoot birds is because it is hard to show emotion in a bird shot. that said, it can be done and for me those are the best. I think this goes with most wildlife shots. I have 5,000 publishable deer images, I think there are 20 that I REALLY like.
I think many people get a close-up, sharp image and are very much happy after all, most birds are difficult to get near let along photograph well, so a shot of one that's sharp with good color is great, but at the end of the day, I think action and life is what makes a great shot. . . . the only way to make great shots is to understand the subject, and be there during the right time. I think the third image starts to get there, but would be better if it had a little more habitat and were not dead center in the frame. . .
Nice images nonetheless. . .
Tony
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
1,813
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums6
Topics635
Posts1,014
Members3,319
|
Most Online3,015 Sep 23rd, 2025
|
|
|