Well, James - you did it again.
Excellent interview with Steve. (Though it might just be this one is older and I only now read it...)
The review on the DVD was very good - it was the DVD review which led me to Steve's interview. I like that the DVD review was unbiased and offered some suggestions for improvement - that angle is a great way for me to better understand what may be "missing" from the DVD - not that there is anything missing, as it sounds like a solid resource. I like Steve's approach to the workshops.
As for the interview itself, you are clearly a very good listener. Using actual phrases Steve said as the basis for questions is fantastic - a bit difficult to manage on the fly, and a clear sign of a good listener. It clearly works as a way to get the interviewee to expound on a thought.
Your three-part approach to these interviews is a great way to handle it as well - who they are, the business side of things and their thoughts on the environment.
Excellent work.
I'd like to add that I appreciate your time and the direction you take these interviews in - having written for magazines myself, I know it's not a simple, or quick, task to construct and article or interview.
I'll throw in a question - maybe this IS already covered, and I've simply missed it - and it could be totally irrelevant, but here goes:
Is there a place to ask the interviewees for some advice for those starting, or thinking of starting, from the business side? I recall one interview touching on this, and we could simply 'follow the interviewee's tracks", but it might be nice to flat out ask:
"If you could give one peice of advice for someone starting a pet photography business, what would it be - what one thing is important enough to make a difference for them starting out?"
~ replace "pet photography business" with whatever is relevant
~ the advice could be "become technically proficient", "use good gear", "take a business class" - which I've seen mentioned, etc.
Like I said, this could already be in your thoughts while doing the interview, and I may simply be missing it as I envision a defacto, structured, question along these lines.
Regardless of MY thoughts, please keep up the good work.
Duane