|
A sampling of the Yellowstone work.
#23199
06/02/09 11:12 AM
06/02/09 11:12 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Eden (no really!)
jamesdak
OP
Old hand
|
OP
Old hand
Joined: Jul 2006
Eden (no really!)
|
Finally, I got a trip into the park. Lots of wildlife as expected but did not see but one wolf and few bears. But now that I'm more in tune with locations, times, and distances I can better plan where to be on the next trip.
Here's a sample of images from the trip.
Now a few observations. While a beautiful place I personally truly find it falling a bit short of the wonderful scenery in Glacier. Asis from the wildlife ops, and of course the thermal features, I did not find the scenery all that different from what I can see on any given day here in northern Utah. But I will be back again and again for the wonderful diversity and multitude of wildlife opportunities.
Get networked, seems to be and "underground" network of shooters sharing wolf kills, den sites, etc. Tap into this source and your golden.
Oh, and a 800/5.6 manual focus lens is tough to use in the dim forest and on dynamic situations like bears and coyotes.
Most used lenses where the 800/5.6, 560/6.8, 400/5.6, 70-200/2.8 and 100/2.0. Other than some scenics with a 50/1.4 these are all the lenses I used. I need to pack lighter next trip as I brought the total kit.
Wonderful trip and the drive only took me exactly 4 1/2 hours without speeding at all. The truck was a big help in pulling off and shooting at several locations and I would recommend a vehicle with clearance over a car myself. Oh, and many times it felt like I was one a race track, why is everyone is such a hurry there??
Anyway, lovely trip and I can't wait to get back. In fact we may go again in two weeks before it get's crazy crowded.
Last edited by jamesdak; 06/02/09 11:13 AM.
|
|
|
Re: A sampling of the Yellowstone work.
[Re: RomanJohnston]
#23203
06/03/09 12:35 PM
06/03/09 12:35 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Helena, MT
Don Edwards
Venturer
|
Venturer
Joined: Mar 2007
Helena, MT
|
Fantastic shots Jim, my favs are the two of the fox and the wide angle with the bison. My wife and I agree with you, for wildlife photos Yellowstone is the place to go. We've always enjoyed the diverse wildlife you get to see there.
Don
"I am a soldier, I fight where I am told, and I win where I fight."
|
|
|
Re: A sampling of the Yellowstone work.
[Re: glamson]
#23205
06/03/09 10:41 PM
06/03/09 10:41 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Eden (no really!)
jamesdak
OP
Old hand
|
OP
Old hand
Joined: Jul 2006
Eden (no really!)
|
Quote:
Jim,
Glad to hear you finally got to the park and thanks for sharing the wildlife images. I do have a technical question about the first three. It looks to me like you might have had to do a significant crop on these. The thing that really struck me though was the pretty rough looking bokeh with these images. Is that an issue with the lens you were using? I have to say that your results with the Nikkor 800mm has me looking around for one of these. That image of the eagle at ISO800 with that lens is just great.
I know what you mean here. Yellowstone scenery is all about geological features, river meadows, and waterfalls. But you can always drive south for 30 minutes to the Tetons for spectacular mountains. However, nothing in the lower 48 beats Glacier for snow capped mountains and valleys.
Again, thanks for sharing.
Geo
It's easier to show the full image versus trying to say how much was cropped so here they are unprocessed and just downsized.
As for the bokeh, it is busy but so were the backgrounds. In careful processing of these I would normally use a blur routine to selectively even out the background. I was really work pretty quickly on all shots as the animals were up close but moving. With the coyote I had actually been shooting some ground squirrels, caught motion out of the corner of my eye, turned, and there was the coyote in the sage about 20 feet away.
This shot better shows what the surroundings where like:
As for the 800mm, it can deliver. But it is also a bear to work with if the light is not good. At least on my D300 it is because the viewfinder is not really set up for manually focusing. Liveview can help if time and light allows. Just trying to follow the one bear while moving the tripod and 12 lb lens was a challenge, then getting focus on the moving subject in the forest was, well, not very successful. I shot 4 young badgers and the mother with it from a distance of about 50 yards. A quick glance through the 100 or so frames has not found any where I truly hit focus. For more seditary well lit subjects the 800 can rock and is a bargain compared to most modern equivalents.
Last edited by jamesdak; 06/03/09 10:42 PM.
|
|
|
Re: A sampling of the Yellowstone work.
[Re: James Morrissey]
#23207
06/04/09 08:41 AM
06/04/09 08:41 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Eden (no really!)
jamesdak
OP
Old hand
|
OP
Old hand
Joined: Jul 2006
Eden (no really!)
|
Quote:
Hey Jim,
Where did you see the fox cubs? I almost NEVER see fox.
James
If you go out the east gate about two miles you will hit Pahaska Teepee campground. There is an old lodge there and the den is under the porch. I had two different shooters tell me about it. Also good Grizzly at the river behind the lodge. A major storm dumped on me soon after getting there so I did not actually stay long. There was a Grizzly on the bank of the river while I was shooting the fox.
On my drive in the first morning I also saw a red fox on the road coming in from West Yellowstone. But, did not find a den site despite returning a couple of times to scout the area.
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
532
guests, and 4
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums6
Topics639
Posts1,026
Members3,319
| |
Most Online4,044 Nov 13th, 2025
|
|
|