|
Re: Tripod Heads
[Re: RomanJohnston]
#2883
04/10/06 12:20 PM
04/10/06 12:20 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Alaska
DavidRamey
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Alaska
|
Roman, Murphy's law is playing with me. I have heard this advice several times and from several different sources and now that I opened my big mouth, I can't find the damn references to save my life. LOL I am sure that one of the references was from John Shaw. Let me do some looking (inbetween actual photography work) and I will see if I can point you to the references.
David Ramey Photography
|
|
|
Re: Tripod Heads
[Re: DavidRamey]
#2884
07/09/06 12:34 PM
07/09/06 12:34 PM
|
Joined: May 2005
Loopman
Venturer
|
Venturer
Joined: May 2005
|
Has anyone here tried the new model Achratech? I understand that they fixed some of the ergonomic issues in the first generation.
Lou
Last edited by Loopman; 07/09/06 12:40 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Tripod Heads
[Re: Loopman]
#2885
07/09/06 09:18 PM
07/09/06 09:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Alaska
DavidRamey
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Alaska
|
I use the Markins M-20 Ball Head. Rated at 90lbs and weighs only 1.25 lbs. I have this mounted on a Gitzo G1325 Tripod and the whole thing weighs less than my old Bogen 3221 with the Bogen 3262 Ball Head.
David Ramey Photography
|
|
|
Re: Tripod Heads
[Re: James Morrissey]
#2887
07/12/06 04:32 PM
07/12/06 04:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Alaska
DavidRamey
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Alaska
|
I really like the Markins Ball Head. I was able to play with a Kirk B-1 and the RRS BH-55 ball heads and I am convinced that all three are of equal quality. I chose the Markins because of the friction adjustment. The friction adjustment is similar to the Arca-Swiss Ball Head. It is inset in the main control knob and really only needs to be adjusted once. The Kirk and RRS has a seperate friction control knob. I liked the design of the Markins better and went with it. I could see me in a stressful situation grabbing the wrong knob to adjust and the Markins has 1 large main control knob and a smaller pano control knob and less chance for a mistake. The Markins is also the lightest of them all and is built like a tank. I bought the Markins because it would work best for me and should not betaken that it is better than any of the other ball heads. The only real difference between all the top quality ball heads is egonomics and therefore other people could make a different decision and be justified in their decision. I would recommend anybody that buys the Markins ball head, buy it without a QR clamp and install the QR clamp from Kirk. The Kirk QR clamp has a bubble level built into it and a better feeling knob and is faster to operate the clamp. I don't like the lever release from RRS because it can become loose due to wear after a while and know a few people that has already experienced that problem with theirs. While RRS will warranty replace the clamp, it doesn't help when you are at a photo shoot miles away from home. I like the Markins so much that I am going to buy another for my window mount so I don't have to keep taking the ball head off my tripod when I want to use the window mount.
Last edited by DavidRamey; 07/12/06 04:34 PM.
David Ramey Photography
|
|
|
Re: Tripod Heads
[Re: Dale53]
#2891
12/28/06 09:08 PM
12/28/06 09:08 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Wales, U.K.
Jeremy68
Wanderer
|
Wanderer
Joined: Dec 2006
Wales, U.K.
|
A much cheaper alternative to the Wimberley heads is the Manfrotto 393 (Bogen 3421 in the States). I saw a fellow recently using one with a Nikon 600mm, and the performance and smoothness and stability of operation were excellent. Worked well with my Sigma 500 f/4.5, also. Here is a link to a brief review with pictures: http://www.digiscoped.com/manfrotto701RC2.html#anchor_21
Jeremy
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
2,354
guests, and 2
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums6
Topics636
Posts1,015
Members3,319
| |
Most Online3,525 Oct 24th, 2025
|
|
|