|
|
|
Re: Grand Teton Sunrise - Redux 2
[Re: James Morrissey]
#5969
01/31/07 01:34 PM
01/31/07 01:34 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Kansas
spartacusii
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Kansas
|
james - i don't know that i am any more qualified to comment on this than you might be. but when i look at this image, i like everything about it compositionally. the only thing that jumped out at me was it just seemed to have a film over it. so i played with it ever so briefly, & here is what i came up with. see what you think of it by comparison.
Last edited by spartacusii; 01/31/07 01:36 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Grand Teton Sunrise - Redux 2
[Re: James Morrissey]
#5971
02/07/07 05:40 PM
02/07/07 05:40 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Warrenton
Paul Lowelll
Wanderer
|
Wanderer
Joined: Feb 2007
Warrenton
|
I think they both look like paintings but the second one would look real nice over my fire place.
Nikon D2H
Fuji S3pro
Sigma 24-70 2.8
Nikon 70-200 VR 2.8
|
|
|
Re: Grand Teton Sunrise - Redux 2
[Re: James Morrissey]
#5972
02/13/07 01:34 PM
02/13/07 01:34 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
glamson
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
|
Quote:
This is another shot of the Tetons from the same time. As I said earlier, I am still playing with different crops of it - but I generally like this shot as well.
James,
I'm new to this forum and I really like your critique area. I love Grand Tetons and capturing the Big Teats is always fun. You obviously did a great job here.
Now I'm not sure if it is because of the reduction of your pics to low resolution web images but I find both of them a little soft. I don't mind soft with round curvy mountains, but these relatively young baby mountains have so much detail, I think they cry out to be sharp. I also think you let the highlights go on the mountains in the second one. I think you were probably going for the reflection (or it's another effect of downsizing), which I'm always a succer for, but you lost the mountains themselves. I know you were going for width on the second one, but I think you had the right idea of trying to be more intimate in the first one. Please excuse my playing with your photo, but I just thought you might try this kind of a crop to the second pic to get the intamacy and the reflection. I apologize for the artefacts in the edited version, but the low res pic off the web didn't leave much room for fiddling. I also darkened and saturated the sky a bit. I think this pic would be a great candidate for using a Rowell graduated ND filter during the capture, or for HDR in PP.
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
1,734
guests, and 4
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums6
Topics637
Posts1,018
Members3,319
| |
Most Online4,044
Nov 13th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
