20 or 25% Discount?
#28743
03/22/10 06:38 PM
03/22/10 06:38 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim Garvie
OP
Addict
|
OP
Addict
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
|
At this year's Rottweiler National, I'm going to offer a pre-paid discount for folks on their first 8X10 print which will extend to all their other products when they actually place their order later after they've reviewed their proofs. The objective is, obviously, to generate cashflow and obligate as many people as possible to order by offering a fairly strong financial incentive.
How strong you might ask? Well, that's my question too. I don't believe that there is a huge difference in terms of incentive between a 20% discount and a 25% discount. My standard original 8X10 pricing is $30 so at a 20% discount, that would be $24 and at a 25% discount, $22.50. At the 25% rate, I'd have to generate a 33% increase in sales to break even on pricing. However, the fact that I'd have cash in advance is a primary incentive to offer the pre-paid discount and might very well pay for the trip to and from Greeley, Colorado. So, beyond profit motives, the increased cashflow might be enough to warrant the discount for those who take advantage of it.
My question to the forum is: would you offer a 20% pre-paid discount or a 25% and why.
Thanks in advance for your opinions.
Jim
Last edited by jimgarvie; 03/22/10 07:22 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 20 or 25% Discount?
[Re: Jim Garvie]
#28744
04/06/10 01:49 PM
04/06/10 01:49 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Dallas, TX
TeresaBerg
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Jul 2009
Dallas, TX
|
I think I might skip the discount on a single print in favor of a discount on a package. Kind of a "reward" for a bigger purchase but I may be the wrong person to ask since I only do in-person sales and don't shoot at dog shows. The market is certainly different!
This is probably a topic for a separate thread but whenever I photograph dogs for a Breeder my sales are much smaller than when it's a family coming in for a dog portrait. It seems odd to me -- since some of the breeders spend THOUSANDS of dollars on their show dogs -- yet they seem to balk at spending money on portraits of them.
Teresa
Unleashed | fine are pet photography workshops unleashed2009.wordpress.com
|
|
|
Re: 20 or 25% Discount?
[Re: psmith]
#28746
04/06/10 04:20 PM
04/06/10 04:20 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim Garvie
OP
Addict
|
OP
Addict
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
|
Preston while I appreciate your point of view, the whole idea is to get them committed to purchasing at the point of when the photo is taken so they can't simply decide to wait until the image is posted on the ARC website and right-click on it to save it for their own website. Last year, the multi-winners had lots of photos taken but they bought only one or two because they could get the others off the site and then could wait for the ARC Newsletter which publishes all the major placements. So I spent a lot of time and energy taking pictures for use in media for which I receive no compensation and, because they are a contract item, I have to provide them regardless of whether or not I've been paid for them.
So, by offering a discount at point of photo, I hook the buyers on their first "win" and I get a pre-payment which is good for my cashflow. If they get more wins, they most likely would take advantage of the discount as well. So, if someone had the Best In Futurity dog and they bought at the discount rate -- and then went Best In Sweepstakes -- they would be very likely to purchase that photo at the discount as well.
BTW, I agree that there's not much more incentive between 20% and 25% so I'm going with 20%. Unlike most show photographers, I tend not to punish folks who are very successful at large shows like the National and I usually provide a discount to those folks "under the table" when I proof the images. Most photographers just charge their top rate and get as much as they can. In doing so, I believe they get less than they should because folks are limited in what they *perceive* they can afford in today's economy. A discount makes it easier to rationalize.
The product "throw in" works well for private portraits but it really doesn't work well for show formals. That's a totally different animal.
Jim
|
|
|
Re: 20 or 25% Discount?
[Re: Julie]
#28748
04/06/10 05:24 PM
04/06/10 05:24 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim Garvie
OP
Addict
|
OP
Addict
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
|
Quote:
Teresa, the motivation for breeder/show photography is very different than the motivation for a pet person. I couldn't make a living on dog show advertising photography. I don't even do it unless I get a commitment of 4 clients at a time.
Julie, while I agree with your comment about what motivates pet people vs show people I don't quite understand this comment. Are you saying you will only accept an advertising client if they bring you 3 others or if they commit to 4 ads?
Teresa, we deal with both our puppy owners and our advertising clients and while the motivation is different with each, they will both order and both pay. The advertising clients *need* new images for their advertising and they are constantly looking for them; the puppy owners *want* images of their puppies as they are growing up and will pay for them on a recurring basis.
The key with advertising clients is to find the ones with the good dogs that are nationally competitive and be able to both capture good images, develop good ads and know where to place them and how to get decent placement within the publications. I'm not sure I'd make enough with the photographic piece of the advertising clients alone but together with the ad development and placement, it pays some of the bills.
Pet portraits are definitely an emotional purchase and therefore tend to be more lucrative. You can make some $$$ on that 16X20 canvas wrap but you won't get an order for that from most of the show folks. A few. But only a few.
Jim
|
|
|
Re: 20 or 25% Discount?
[Re: Jim Poor]
#28750
04/06/10 06:48 PM
04/06/10 06:48 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim Garvie
OP
Addict
|
OP
Addict
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
|
Jim, people don't perceive that 25% is all that much more than 20% according to the marketing studies. Logically, you'd think so but it just isn't so. Plus, raising prices to give a discount is something a Wall Street Investment Banker would do. Not my game  . Jim
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
201
guests, and 10
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums6
Topics628
Posts992
Members3,317
|
Most Online876 Apr 25th, 2024
|
|
|