Like the article? Please share it. We are a small site and word of mouth is everything at a time when a few social media companies control pretty much everything. I am trying to produce more content recently because visitation has been so strong. Also, if you have ideas for a story, don't be afraid to reach out to me through the Facebook Group.

If you are new to our website, please feel free to look around and read our many articles and artist showcase interviews.

http://www.nwpphotoforum.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=cfrm

If you like the article, please join our forum and I will send you surprisingly rare spam with new articles when I have something that I think is worth posting. Also, please consider joining our photography group on Facebook, a very positive and supportive environment for people interested in Nature, Landscape and Wildlife Photography. Membership is as easy as answering 3 simple questions and agreeing to avoid controversial topics like religion and politics in the group. It is the only reason I still and a member of the FB community.

Link to FB Group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/nwpphotoforum

Please remember that the text and all images in this article are (c) 2025, James Morrissey.

Tags & Keywords:
Mormon Row, TA Moulton Barn, John Moulton Barn, Grand Teton Photography

I won't photograph the Mormon Row EVER again (and neither should you)!!!

How to Read a Histogram: A Photographer’s Guide

How many of us have had an experience in the field that we thought was mind-blowing that turned out to be only 'ho hum' when we got home? I can't speak for you, but I certainly know that I have. Because the LCD display is optimized for easy viewing with our human eyes, it can unfortunately be a big fat liar at conveying what you actually just photographed. There is no worse feeling when that image you think is beautiful when you took it in the field looks like an under-exposed mush when you get home on your desktop. OK - that is an absolute lie. There are many, many worse feelings. But, since we are talking about photography and not about having contracted gonorrhea while riding a tractor, I will allow the original statement to stand. Using the histogram as a guide (but not a master) can really help prevent this from happening. It is essentially photographic penicillin for your photographic gonorrhea. OK. Also not really true, but I like to think you will be both entertained and educated throughout this article.

What the Histogram Represents:
The Histogram is something that you have seen either on the back of your camera or in your editing software. It is a visual graph that represents the tonal distribution of an image— from the darkest shadows to the brightest highlights. The X Axis of the histogram displays the readouts of three channels: Red, Green, and Blue. Each channel is then measured on a scale of 0 (absolute black) to 255 (absolute white). Everything in between represents shades of gray formed by combinations of those three channels. Looking at the graph, the left side corresponds to shadows (0), the middle to midtones, and the right to highlights (255). The Y Axis of the graph shows you HOW OFTEN each of these variables occur. So, peaks on the left indicate many dark pixels; peaks on the right indicate many bright ones.

Also, if this sounds a bit too simple, it kind of is. Modern sensors actually record far more tonal information, many capturing 12–14 bits per channel, translating into thousands of brightness levels. That said, the histogram is a simplified interface designed to give you a quick and accessible snapshot of tonal distribution. When using an RGB histogram, each color channel has its own 0–255 range, and clipping in a single channel can cause color distortions even when the luminance graph looks normal. For people who might be asking what "Clipping" is, it is simply what happens when data gets lost. This can happen on either side of your histogram. If the histogram spills over on the left, shadow detail is lost to pure black; if it spills on the right, highlights are blown out to pure white.

The following image is an unprocessed image (by that, I mean that it is a RAW image that I simply hit "process" without any changes. Obviously, the moment it goes from RAW to .jpg, you have done something to the file, but the changes are at best, minimal). It is also important to note that I took this on my Canon EOS 5DSR, which was a viewfinder camera. Today, when shooting with my R5 Mark IIs, I have the benefit of a histogram when I am actually shooting the image through my viewfinder.




The two histograms: Luminance and R-G-B.

1. Luminance Histogram - What is it?
The Luminance Histogram is an easy to read bar that combines the Red, Blue and Green channels in to one easy to read at a glance and great for general exposure. The big problem is that it can hide problems in individual channels. You might think you’re fine, only to discover a clipped red channel and magenta highlights when editing. If your work involves rich color, it’s worth checking the RGB histogram regularly.


Unedited Luminance Histogram of the Above Image - What does it tell you?

I provided a histogram "cheat sheet" that I thought might be helpful. Looking at the Luminance Histogram, you might say (using the Cheat Sheet I provided Below), "[*] Nothing touches either edge: I am underusing the dynamic range of my camera." Most of the data falls in the middle of the histogram, meaning lots of mid-tones and few to no Shadow or Highlights. Remembering the day, this is more or less accurate - however, when you look at the RGB Histogram, you get a slightly more nuanced story.

2. RGB Histogram - What is It?
This combines the red, green, and blue channels into one graph and is particularly valuable for managing saturated colors—sunsets, skin tones, neon signs, etc. As a landscape photographer, one of my biggest fears is blowing out a single channel—often (but not always) red—during a dramatic sunrise or canyon scene. In these situations, slightly underexposing to account for that particular channel is often the safest best. Cameras can usually recover shadow detail, but they can’t recreate highlight data that never existed in the first place. While my goal is to get things right 'in camera' as much as possible, it is mostly because I hate taking time at the computer, not because I think it is cheating.


Unedited Red-Green-Blue Histogram of the Above Image - What does it tell you?

Looking at the Red, Green and Blue channels, you actually see something quite different. While the Blue Channel definitely shares similarities with the Luminance Histogram, the Red and Green channels show something very different. The bulk of the Red and Green channels are planted in the shadow to middle zones of the graph. Punctuated throughout those are highlight tones going nearly towards the end of the scale of the X Axis. While there is not a preponderance of Red and Green in those sections, it is enough that I would have blown out sections of the image had I not been paying attention to those portions of the histogram.

So, now that I have blathered on about the importance of checking the histogram (particularly reviewing the full Red, Green and Blue Channels) - let me make things a bit murky. The information that you have now gleaned is not inherently good or bad. The histogram tells you that you have information in a particular channel. There is NO PERFECT HISTOGRAM and just because your histogram is shaped a particular way does not mean you are going to get a better image than another. The “right” histogram is the one that supports your creative and technical goals. In reality, different lighting scenarios produce different tonal signatures. For example, a high-contrast night cityscape might show spikes at both ends (see below). A soft, foggy morning (like the image I showed above) might cluster gently in the midtones. A studio portrait might lean right if you’re working with a high-key setup. So, anyone who tells you something like "expose to the right" (a pet peeve of mine) is meaning to give good advice, but they are not really helping you understand the many faces and nuances of what you are actually capturing.


NYC Skyline on 9/11/23


NYC Skyline on 9/11 Luminance Histogram


NYC Skyline R-G-B Histogram



This is an image I took two years ago and mothballed. What you see is exactly what was taken, minus a minor tweak of the white balance. Thinking about the histograms what do we see? Honestly, nothing really surprising. Most of the Y axis of the histogram are in the shadow end of the image for all three channels and also when you look at the luminance histogram. What you also see is that I went out of my way to not pop the highlights on the other end, which is what is causing so much of the image to register in the shadow values. What could I have done differently, and should I have? I actually really like this image and I don't mind that the pylons are so much in shadow. If I were trying to bring them out, I would have incorporated a Neutral Density Card on the brighter components of the image to try to bring out my shadows a bit. Or - lol, I could do just as I did and shot the image and let the shadow tones fall where they were, which is exactly what I did. Remember that a histogram just tells a story. There is no inherent value in it outside of giving you information about what is in the image you took. If you are satisfied with that, A++. If you feel like you want to make changes accordingly, you can do that too. The point is that the histogram will tell you exactly what you have so that when you go home, you are not surprised by what you don't have.



The Histogram Cheat Sheet (What to Do When You See X Shape)

• Big spike slammed left (shadows clipped): Consider Increasing your exposure, add light, or finding a way to embrace a silhouette.
• Big spike slammed right (highlights blown): Speed up your exposure (use a faster shutter), stop down your exposure (i.e. use a narrower F-Stop if appropriate), consider adding a Neutral Density Filter to stop down your highlights.
• Data bunched in the middle: Low-contrast scene—can be fine; consider adding contrast or using soft light intentionally.
• Two peaks, left and right (high contrast): Dramatic lighting; consider bracketing or using a ND Filter.
• Thin, scattered data: Even, balanced lighting; often ideal for natural light portraits and landscapes.
• One channel clipped (RGB histogram): Lower exposure slightly or adjust white balance; watch for color shifts in edits.
• Nothing touches either edge: Underusing dynamic range—sometimes good, sometimes dull

At the end of the day, mastering histograms isn’t about memorizing rules—it’s about helping provide real time feedback in the field to let you know that you have data where you think you need it. Paying attention to the histogram helps give you some guardrails to make sure that when you finally get to see the image on your (hopefully) calibrated monitor that you did not kick yourself that you either slightly over-exposed the image or way under-exposed it.

In an upcoming article, I hope to put together a small piece on how to actually post process the images you captured in the field.