NWPBanner
Welcome! NWPphotoforum.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Common Merganser #12996
02/01/08 05:19 PM
02/01/08 05:19 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
NY USA
Jim Rickards Offline OP
Journeyman
Jim Rickards  Offline OP
Journeyman

Joined: Oct 2007
NY USA
This was shot from a blind, supported by a monopod. I'm interested in comments on the intensity of the green of the head of this bird. The decision to enhance that green in Photoshop or leave it looking as it was in nature is what I would like feedback on, plus anything else you have.

Re: Common Merganser [Re: Jim Rickards] #12997
02/01/08 06:17 PM
02/01/08 06:17 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Manhattan, New York, New York
James Morrissey Offline
I
James Morrissey  Offline
I
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2005
Manhattan, New York, New York
Hey Jim,

The colors as you have them look very natural. It might be interesting to try to bring the eye as well as the duck's colors a bit in PS.

James

Re: Common Merganser [Re: Jim Rickards] #12998
02/01/08 09:17 PM
02/01/08 09:17 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
glamson Offline
Veteran
glamson  Offline
Veteran

Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
Quote:

This was shot from a blind, supported by a monopod. I'm interested in comments on the intensity of the green of the head of this bird. The decision to enhance that green in Photoshop or leave it looking as it was in nature is what I would like feedback on, plus anything else you have.





Jim,

Mergansers are great birds. I've seen them up at my cabin at Donner Pass in CA.

Since you're asking for input I have to say that this image has some problems. The lighting is really flat and on my calibrated monitor, it looks dark and I don't see the green color in the head. Also cutting off the tail really makes for a unbalanced composition. I would definitely want to bring out the green color and the eye, even at the sake of it not being quite "natural". Hope you don't mind, but here is what I would have done with this image.


Re: Common Merganser [Re: glamson] #12999
02/01/08 10:29 PM
02/01/08 10:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
NY USA
Jim Rickards Offline OP
Journeyman
Jim Rickards  Offline OP
Journeyman

Joined: Oct 2007
NY USA
I appreciate both the opinions, and how quickly they were given. I've re-processed it much the same as shown in your re-post. I've cropped it wider too. No more of the tail is visible, since it goes underwater, but since it gives the impression of being cut off, it has to be changed. BTW, some nice Egrets in your gallery, George.

Re: Common Merganser [Re: Jim Rickards] #13000
02/02/08 11:23 AM
02/02/08 11:23 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Manhattan, New York, New York
James Morrissey Offline
I
James Morrissey  Offline
I
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2005
Manhattan, New York, New York
Hey George,

I am not seeing your version of the photograph - but it is obvious that Jim is...

-James

Re: Common Merganser [Re: glamson] #13001
02/02/08 01:30 PM
02/02/08 01:30 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Nashville Tennessee
Durwood Edwards Offline
Old hand
Durwood Edwards  Offline
Old hand

Joined: Dec 2006
Nashville Tennessee
Quote:

I would definitely want to bring out the green color and the eye, even at the sake of it not being quite "natural".jpg




For me a decision to enhance a photograph is based on the answer to the question I ask myself, "Do I want this to look like what the camera recorded or what the scene or animal actually looks like?"

The decision is simple and guilt free

Last edited by Durwood Edwards; 02/02/08 01:32 PM.

Durwood Edwards
www.joelton.org

"Never miss a good chance to shut-up!" - Will Rogers
Re: Common Merganser [Re: Durwood Edwards] #13002
02/02/08 10:47 PM
02/02/08 10:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
NY USA
Jim Rickards Offline OP
Journeyman
Jim Rickards  Offline OP
Journeyman

Joined: Oct 2007
NY USA
Quote:

Quote:

I would definitely want to bring out the green color and the eye, even at the sake of it not being quite "natural".jpg




For me a decision to enhance a photograph is based on the answer to the question I ask myself, "Do I want this to look like what the camera recorded or what the scene or animal actually looks like?"

The decision is simple and guilt free




Some would choose a third option: "Let's make this duck look as good and attractive as possible." That's the one I was guarding against. But back to your point. The duck has a very black looking head, but in bright sun (as shot) I saw splashes of the green showing fairly well. So one could go either way without guilt. I don't want to make the green more saturated than it was.


Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 664 guests, and 1 spider.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
CTiefisher, DrSuse BlueDevil, airphotog, dwilson7878, carters paul
3317 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums6
Topics627
Posts989
Members3,317
Most Online876
Apr 25th, 2024

Copyright 2005 - 2020 Nature, Wildlife, and Pet Photography Forum. "NWPPhotoforum" and "nwpphotoforum.com" are the property of Nature, Wildlife, and Pet Photography Forum. All Rights Reserved. Wild Coyote Studio, New York Pet Photographer

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 5.6.40-1+hw4 Page Time: 0.034s Queries: 14 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9212 MB (Peak: 1.9677 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-26 07:19:13 UTC