NWPBanner
Welcome! NWPphotoforum.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Moonset at Stovepipe #14510
04/11/08 04:19 AM
04/11/08 04:19 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
glamson Offline OP
Veteran
glamson  Offline OP
Veteran

Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
Wow, two separate posts from Stovepipe in Death Valley. I happened to be there when you get that rare lighting condition with a full moon setting right at dawn. Unfortunately, it was not quite perfect and for anybody that takes these moon shots, the dilemma is always how to expose for very low light and not blow out the moon. Well to answer the question before it is asked, yes this moon was dropped in. However, it is the same moon that was shining then. What I did was to take the shot twice, exposing for the scene and then for the moon. Then in a sort of extreme HDR, I dropped the properly exposed moon into the properly exposed scene. This was about the best I could do.


Re: Moonset at Stovepipe [Re: glamson] #14511
04/11/08 07:10 AM
04/11/08 07:10 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
NY USA
Jim Rickards Offline
Journeyman
Jim Rickards  Offline
Journeyman

Joined: Oct 2007
NY USA
This is a nice composition, George. The leading line just happens to go to the moon (Oh, wait, you dropped that in!). Good work. I expect you have a few more?

Re: Moonset at Stovepipe [Re: glamson] #14512
04/11/08 07:57 AM
04/11/08 07:57 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim Garvie Offline
Addict
Jim Garvie  Offline
Addict

Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
George,
love the composition but, to be honest, I'd lighten the moon a bit just to make it look more natural. Anyway, that's my 2 cents worth. The lighting on the landscape is lovely (boy, is that alliterative!).

Jim


Jim Garvie
www.jagphoto.biz
Re: Moonset at Stovepipe [Re: glamson] #14513
04/11/08 11:17 AM
04/11/08 11:17 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
oregon
dave_lines Offline
Venturer
dave_lines  Offline
Venturer

Joined: Jul 2007
oregon
Looks natural to me, who is going to know if you dropped the moon in or not unless you tell them? (well, maybe another photographer). DAve

Re: Moonset at Stovepipe [Re: dave_lines] #14514
04/11/08 12:32 PM
04/11/08 12:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
glamson Offline OP
Veteran
glamson  Offline OP
Veteran

Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
Quote:

Looks natural to me, who is going to know if you dropped the moon in or not unless you tell them? (well, maybe another photographer). DAve




Dave,

Thanks for the feedback. I think this is actually about as close to what I remember of how it looked like to my eye. Of course the nice thing about the eye is it can compensate for the lighting of different objects and has lots of dynamic range. The sensor in my camera, not so much.

I would only "explain" the moon on a forum like this. I've posted enough of these types of shots that I know someone will always ask about the moon. And like most things in life, everyone has their own opinion.

Thanks again.

Geo

Re: Moonset at Stovepipe [Re: glamson] #14515
04/11/08 06:54 PM
04/11/08 06:54 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Arizona
daveman Offline
Old hand
daveman  Offline
Old hand

Joined: Mar 2007
Arizona
George,

Nice shot. That is such a magical time - full moon setting at sunset, and I really like the way you captured it.

I had a similar challenge with exposure on the shot below. What I did here was to use an offshoot of Roman's HDR technique off the same exposure. I brought two versions of the same RAW file into different layers in PS and used a brush to mask out the moon. I thought about dropping a moon in from a different shot, but this seemed to work ok.



Anyway - nice shot of death valley! I need to go there some time.

Last edited by daveman; 04/11/08 06:56 PM.

See my stuff here davedilli.zenfolio.com
Re: Moonset at Stovepipe [Re: daveman] #14516
04/12/08 03:14 AM
04/12/08 03:14 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
glamson Offline OP
Veteran
glamson  Offline OP
Veteran

Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
Quote:

George,

Nice shot. That is such a magical time - full moon setting at sunset, and I really like the way you captured it.

I had a similar challenge with exposure on the shot below. What I did here was to use an offshoot of Roman's HDR technique off the same exposure. I brought two versions of the same RAW file into different layers in PS and used a brush to mask out the moon. I thought about dropping a moon in from a different shot, but this seemed to work ok.

Anyway - nice shot of death valley! I need to go there some time.




Yes, I would say that it worked OK. Great shot.

I was going to try to do something similar with the two exposures I took, but I moved the camera a little and couldn't get them to line up. It was just easier to cut the moon out of one and drop it into the other. Roman's technique didn't work because the moon was too far gone in the exposure I took.

Geo

Re: Moonset at Stovepipe [Re: glamson] #14517
04/12/08 07:50 AM
04/12/08 07:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Ontario Canada
JimmyD Offline
Tracker
JimmyD  Offline
Tracker

Joined: Mar 2008
Ontario Canada
Dave and George

Both very nice shots. I had taken some time off photography and just recently came back. I had done some digital but nothing serious, i did most of my serious work in medium format film.

I find it amazing how digital photography is evolving where our own creativity is pretty much the only limitation we have.

Thanks for sharing


Jim Davis Spiorad an Dúlra http://jimmy-d.smugmug.com
Re: Moonset at Stovepipe [Re: JimmyD] #14518
04/12/08 08:39 AM
04/12/08 08:39 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim Garvie Offline
Addict
Jim Garvie  Offline
Addict

Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim,
like everything else, digital can be overdone but the type of thing that both George and Dave have done is to use digital processing to capture the "vision" they had when they took the original shot. Sometimes the camera can't have the same "cerebral dynamic range" that the brain has.

Roman Johnston does similar things with his HDR approach to landscapes. He manages to pull the detail out of the highlights and shadows that you could never do with film. And his HDR approach is very well-managed. Some folks over-do it and the images look unnatural. But these guys use it in moderation and what you see tends to match the minds eye.

Welcome back to photography. You're going to enjoy digital. If you ever need any advice, there are lots of folks here who are very good and very willing to share.

Jim


Jim Garvie
www.jagphoto.biz

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 128 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
CTiefisher, DrSuse BlueDevil, airphotog, dwilson7878, carters paul
3317 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums6
Topics629
Posts993
Members3,317
Most Online876
Apr 25th, 2024

Copyright �2005 - 2020 Nature, Wildlife, and Pet Photography Forum. "NWPPhotoforum" and "nwpphotoforum.com" are the property of Nature, Wildlife, and Pet Photography Forum. All Rights Reserved. Wild Coyote Studio, New York Pet Photographer

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 5.6.40-1+hw4 Page Time: 0.069s Queries: 14 (0.040s) Memory: 0.9415 MB (Peak: 1.9695 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-10-12 02:39:17 UTC