NWPBanner
Welcome! NWPphotoforum.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Another Self Assignment [Re: Jim Rickards] #15188
05/18/08 09:16 PM
05/18/08 09:16 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim Garvie Offline OP
Addict
Jim Garvie  Offline OP
Addict

Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim,
yeah, I like it too. Very sharp and lovely bokeh. I need to use it for some indoor dog shooting but for portraits, it's lovely.

That's another one I like to take out and shoot for an assignment just like the one you did. But I'd like to focus (literally) on people and pets. I'll try it once my girl drops her puppies this week. In fact, maybe I'll use it to take some very early puppy shots.

Jim


Jim Garvie
www.jagphoto.biz
Re: The 50mm Challenge [Re: James Morrissey] #15189
06/05/08 07:51 PM
06/05/08 07:51 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim Garvie Offline OP
Addict
Jim Garvie  Offline OP
Addict

Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
James,
I intended to post some pics of the 50 with both tubes and TC but got tied up with the puppies. Sorry about that.

Here's a shot with just the 50 at minimum focusing distance.



Next, here's a shot with the 50 plus a 12 mm tube.



And, finally, the 50 plus 12 mm tube and 1.4 Canon Telextender. Keep in mind that the telextender can't be mounted directly to the lens so it goes after the tube.



This combination won't take the place of a dedicated macro lens but it works just fine. You need to be aware that you lose at least a stop of light with each addition of either a tube or a TC. That's important if you're shooting manually with strobe as I was here.

While I like what I can get with this combo -- and with the 85 as well -- I'm still considering getting either the 100/f2.8 macro or the 60/f2.8 macro. Having a lens that works as a "normal" lens and still will focus down to 1:1 is really nice. More convenient than changing lenses, tubes and TCs. It's more a matter of convenience than image quality in my opinion.

Anyway, here are the shots using the 50. I did the same with the 85 with similar results and a bit more magnification.

Enjoy,

Jim

Attached Files
Last edited by jimgarvie; 06/05/08 07:58 PM.
50mm Challenge - variation [Re: Jim Garvie] #15190
06/06/08 12:46 PM
06/06/08 12:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
glamson Offline
Veteran
glamson  Offline
Veteran

Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
Jim,

I know this is not exactly in the spirit of using this lens for its intended purpose, but I have found my 50mm to be
great for medium to long distance panos. It is amazing how much detail I can get when you combine multiple images with
this super sharp lens. The 50mm focal length can be
somewhat limiting in some pano situations, but when it isn't, the panos are great. There is far less distortion of
the pano panels and the stitching is usually flawless. Here is one I took of the San Diego skyline. You can't really
appreciate it from this low res web version, but the detail in the buildings in the original is impressive.

Geo



Re: 50mm Challenge - variation [Re: glamson] #15191
06/06/08 03:37 PM
06/06/08 03:37 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim Garvie Offline OP
Addict
Jim Garvie  Offline OP
Addict

Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Geo,
wow, very cool. How many images did you stitch together for that image? Even at web-resolution, the detail is incredible.

Jim


Jim Garvie
www.jagphoto.biz
Re: 50mm Challenge - variation [Re: Jim Garvie] #15192
06/06/08 04:23 PM
06/06/08 04:23 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
glamson Offline
Veteran
glamson  Offline
Veteran

Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
Quote:

Geo,
wow, very cool. How many images did you stitch together for that image? Even at web-resolution, the detail is incredible.

Jim




Jim,

This only about 70% of the entire pano which was 11 photos, so I guess this would be about 7 photos and change. I cut off the newer area of SD which has alot of ugly construction cranes.

Geo

Re: 50mm Challenge - variation [Re: glamson] #15193
06/09/08 10:17 AM
06/09/08 10:17 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Eden (no really!)
J
jamesdak Offline
Old hand
jamesdak  Offline
Old hand
J

Joined: Jul 2006
Eden (no really!)
Quote:

Jim,

I know this is not exactly in the spirit of using this lens for its intended purpose, but I have found my 50mm to be
great for medium to long distance panos. It is amazing how much detail I can get when you combine multiple images with
this super sharp lens. The 50mm focal length can be
somewhat limiting in some pano situations, but when it isn't, the panos are great. There is far less distortion of
the pano panels and the stitching is usually flawless. Here is one I took of the San Diego skyline. You can't really
appreciate it from this low res web version, but the detail in the buildings in the original is impressive.

Geo






Geo,

I agree with your comments about detail when stitching shots. I do that a lot myself lately. I tend to use longer lens though. This weekend I shot panos with a 90/2.8, and 100/2.0, a 135/2.8 and a 180/3.4. 8 shots from the 180/3.4 gave me a image cropped down slightly of 51" x 13". The detail in the distant mountains is great. I printed a full size cropped section of the print as a test and you can clearly see birds flying that were over 200 yards off. I also use the same method to shot a more standard square or rectangular image. This has allowed me to all but retire my medium format gear.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 357 guests, and 1 spider.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
CTiefisher, DrSuse BlueDevil, airphotog, dwilson7878, carters paul
3317 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums6
Topics627
Posts989
Members3,317
Most Online876
Apr 25th, 2024

Copyright 2005 - 2020 Nature, Wildlife, and Pet Photography Forum. "NWPPhotoforum" and "nwpphotoforum.com" are the property of Nature, Wildlife, and Pet Photography Forum. All Rights Reserved. Wild Coyote Studio, New York Pet Photographer

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 5.6.40-1+hw4 Page Time: 0.055s Queries: 17 (0.031s) Memory: 0.9299 MB (Peak: 1.9677 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-02 03:42:55 UTC