NWPBanner
Welcome! NWPphotoforum.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
New Member and the Nikon 200-400 VR #1547
01/09/06 02:19 AM
01/09/06 02:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Chicago, IL
L
Libertyh Offline OP
Wanderer
Libertyh  Offline OP
Wanderer
L

Joined: Jan 2006
Chicago, IL
Greetings all: Just signed up and really enjoy the site. I too am a Nikon shooter and just read this evening the Alaska article that Bernie Weinzimmer wrote. It was great article. I own many pieces of Nikon glass and noted in the article that of the Alaskan shooter brought 200-400 VR zoom. I have been trying to decided on this lens or a 500mm lens. I use a D2x and D70. Seems most of the trips attendees were Nikon and have similiar equipment to my listing.

I do shoot some sports with my kids (soccer and wrestling) so the zoom is very attractive. I don't do birds unless I get an opportunity to capture larger ones such as the offerings in Florida or the birds that have wider wing spread. (Frankly, the little ones we have in the Midwest just don't do anything for me.) I do some nature (larger critter) but right now its captive. Most mammal opportunities would be a special trip to their habitat.

I would certainly appreciate anyone feedback or experience on their longer lenses used and their application.


Regards,

Greg

Re: New Member and the Nikon 200-400 VR [Re: Libertyh] #1548
01/10/06 11:07 AM
01/10/06 11:07 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Montana
Tony Bynum Offline
Pooh-Bah
Tony Bynum  Offline
Pooh-Bah

Joined: Feb 2005
Montana
I believe it's a tough call and really depends on your shooting style and subject. That said, if your willing to lug the heft of the 200-400 vr it's a great lens.

If your interested in shooting some sports and some wildlife you may be able to get buy with a 80-400 vr. It has limitations, but it's light weight, and affordable.

The 500 is a awesome lens too. Keep in mind that you will need a sturdy tripod/head, and the means to lug the gear arround.

If you have the cash buy both the 500 and the 200-400!

It's really a tough call. I'd say if it were me I'd go with the 200-400 mostly for the vr, and afs as both lenses area relatively close in size and weight.

I dont think you would be dissapointed with the 200-400, it really is a great lens!

Re: New Member and the Nikon 200-400 VR [Re: Tony Bynum] #1549
01/11/06 10:08 PM
01/11/06 10:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Chicago, IL
L
Libertyh Offline OP
Wanderer
Libertyh  Offline OP
Wanderer
L

Joined: Jan 2006
Chicago, IL
Tony:

Thanks for the reply. I had a 80-400vr. Had same issues many have found: soft at the upper end and slow AF. Sold it when I went full digital, exception of Xpan (love those panoramics). Thanks again.

Greg

Re: New Member and the Nikon 200-400 VR [Re: Libertyh] #1550
01/11/06 10:18 PM
01/11/06 10:18 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Tennessee, USA
RichardR Offline
Journeyman
RichardR  Offline
Journeyman

Joined: Sep 2005
Tennessee, USA
Hi, Greg,

I don't have any experience with those longer lenses but wanted to welcome you to the forum! Good to have another Nikon shooter aboard.

Best regards,

Dick:)


Every day is a good day.

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 406 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
CTiefisher, DrSuse BlueDevil, airphotog, dwilson7878, carters paul
3317 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums6
Topics627
Posts989
Members3,317
Most Online876
Apr 25th, 2024

Copyright 2005 - 2020 Nature, Wildlife, and Pet Photography Forum. "NWPPhotoforum" and "nwpphotoforum.com" are the property of Nature, Wildlife, and Pet Photography Forum. All Rights Reserved. Wild Coyote Studio, New York Pet Photographer

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 5.6.40-1+hw4 Page Time: 0.046s Queries: 14 (0.019s) Memory: 0.8925 MB (Peak: 1.9677 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-28 11:20:42 UTC