I like the looks of these falls,, I too would like to see the top of them,, sounds like a good excuse to go back and reshoot. DAve

I actually have a shot that shows the top of the falls, but the sun was hitting it and some of the plants and it had blown highlights.

I actually had this shot printed in a 24x36 and box mounted. Which worked well because it looked like the water was coming over the top of the box. I had people fighting over who was going to buy it. I kept telling them they could all have a copy. But the first $$$$ takes it home today. It only hung for a week. I made the buyer wait so other people could see it. Plus it was hanging where I was working at the time and I liked looking at it.

Hey George,

I generally use compressed .jpg files. Do you find that the wider color range of the jpg file gets lost in monitor translation?

-James

about the only diff I can see is the greens of the trees are a bit darker and so is the overall brightness of the mtns, water and boats look the same to me, was very hard to see any diff though,,DAve

George, I can see a huge difference on my monitor. The jpg. looks richer and I see artifacts in the Gif.

I can't see a lot of difference in the colors, but the gif shows a lot more graininess. Call it artifacts or pixelization, or whatever. I had to pull them up in CS3 and blow them up to REALLY see the difference though.

I am using an ACER AL1916W 32 bit color 1024x768 pixels.

By the way which type monitor do you prefer for editing photos for printing. LCD or CRT?