Full Frame?
#39214
10/19/12 07:01 PM
10/19/12 07:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2012
WI,USA
Paul Lueders
OP
Wanderer
|
OP
Wanderer
Joined: Jan 2012
WI,USA
|
Are full frame bodies all they're cracked up to be?
Paul Lueders
|
|
|
Re: Full Frame?
[Re: James Morrissey]
#39216
10/20/12 08:11 AM
10/20/12 08:11 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2012
WI,USA
Paul Lueders
OP
Wanderer
|
OP
Wanderer
Joined: Jan 2012
WI,USA
|
I guess my main question is which will produce the sharpest images. Thinking mainly about far away wildlife, using super telephoto lenses. Going full frame and croping images in tighter in post computer work, or going with a croped format with more telephoto reach.
Paul Lueders
|
|
|
Re: Full Frame?
[Re: Paul Lueders]
#39219
10/20/12 11:52 PM
10/20/12 11:52 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Manhattan, New York, New York
James Morrissey
I
|
I
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Feb 2005
Manhattan, New York, New York
|
Hi Paul,
I am going to answer this question two different ways. At the basest level, 35mm lenses were all designed to go on a 35mm sensor. In my opinion, the full frame format is best met in this fashion as while there may be compromises, the system is just designed this way.
Having said that, it is not necessarily a perfect device and crop frame cameras have certain advantages. You specifically mentioned wanting to shoot wildlife and getting the most of a telephoto lens. Well, that is definitely the crop frame camera's reputation to fame...that the smaller sensor yields an alleged field of view difference that yields sharper photos that appear to have been taken with a longer focal length lens. This is achieved by using only the center of the lens. This may provide great adantages...allowing you to use smaller lenses to achieve the same result at the telephoto end.
James
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
121
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums6
Topics628
Posts992
Members3,317
|
Most Online876 Apr 25th, 2024
|
|
|