" For instance, If I'm photographing a pet at the owner's request; if I take a photo of a dog on the street or at a dog park if I intend to use the photo on a website/brochure/porfolio to show the work I'm capable of?"

Hi Crystal,

Welcome to NWP. I am always happy to see new faces here. As to your question about releases, as I understand it, technically you are not required to get a release when you photograph pets. Now (caveat emptor), I am NOT an attorney, so use this information at your own risk.

The only time a release is necessary is when the pet has some distinguishing mark that sets him/her apart from all other creatures - giving them something that is inherently unique. In short, unless there is something that would allow 'Herman' to be set apart from any other 100 golden retrievers (or pick your breed), there is no need for a release.

Releases to use photographs definitely become nescessary when you start including human beings in your photographs.

" but I dont think it's wise and I would never display one with out the owners okay, in the form of a written release. . . "

I will agree with Tony that I think that it generally makes sense to 'cover thy hind most end' when possible when displaying your work - or selling it. It has been my experience that it is not hard to get a release from most folks.

Cheers,
James