NWPBanner
Welcome! NWPphotoforum.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Delicate Arch at Starlight #13950
03/19/08 04:12 PM
03/19/08 04:12 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Ontario Canada
JimmyD Offline OP
Tracker
JimmyD  Offline OP
Tracker

Joined: Mar 2008
Ontario Canada
Hello everyone,

I am from Canada and new to the site so I thought I would start out by posting a recent image from my trip to the American southwest.

This image was sort of an experiment on a highly photographed location, I tried to get something different although I am sure this has been done many times before.

After sunset we waited for the stars to appear and began shooting, using various light sources to light up the arch, finally settling on a single flash burst to light the arch. We had tried lighting from different positions but running around at night in the dark near some drop offs did not seem to safe.

Shot with Nikon D300
ISO 1250 F4 @30 sec.



13973-_DSC2850ab-3.jpg (187 downloads)
Last edited by JimmyD; 03/19/08 04:18 PM.

Jim Davis Spiorad an Dúlra http://jimmy-d.smugmug.com
Re: Delicate Arch at Starlight [Re: JimmyD] #13951
03/19/08 04:32 PM
03/19/08 04:32 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
NY USA
Jim Rickards Offline
Journeyman
Jim Rickards  Offline
Journeyman

Joined: Oct 2007
NY USA
Welcome to the site. That's an interesting way to photograph the arch.

Re: Delicate Arch at Starlight [Re: Jim Rickards] #13952
03/19/08 05:41 PM
03/19/08 05:41 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Montana
Tony Bynum Offline
Pooh-Bah
Tony Bynum  Offline
Pooh-Bah

Joined: Feb 2005
Montana
yea, interesting, I think if you were to use a gel filter you have have be able to get more accurate colors.

cool shot nonetheless. . .It looks scifi. . .

Welcome to NWP!

Re: Delicate Arch at Starlight [Re: JimmyD] #13953
03/20/08 09:03 AM
03/20/08 09:03 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jim Garvie Offline
Addict
Jim Garvie  Offline
Addict

Joined: Mar 2005
Florida
Jimmy,
I like the concept a lot. I'm not sure if painting it with light would give you more detail or whether you preferred the ghostly aspect of it as in your image. But very nice effort regardless.

In presenting the image, I'd suggest you put a dark border around it. The image on white just looks too under-exposed. A dark border would lighten up the arch and help show off the details.

Welcome to the forum.

Jim


Jim Garvie
www.jagphoto.biz
Re: Delicate Arch at Starlight [Re: Jim Garvie] #13954
03/20/08 04:58 PM
03/20/08 04:58 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Ontario Canada
JimmyD Offline OP
Tracker
JimmyD  Offline OP
Tracker

Joined: Mar 2008
Ontario Canada
Thanks for the replies.

The whole color issue is subjective, the color at night is cooler than day or sunset and to my eyes the image posted is closer to what I saw. I have warmed it up in and it does have more of a "realistic" look that we see in daylight hours. We did paint the arch with LED head lamps but the Arch is quit large and the area around it is uneven so scrambling around at night could be dangerous. I agree a black boarder would help it stand out.

I will continue to play with the image and see what I can tweak out of it. 2 weeks of shooting got me 3000 images to pick through from Death Valley, Joshua Tree, Sedona area, Grand Canyon, Arches NP, Bryce NP, Canyon Lands NP, Zion NP, Tuweep/Toroweep and many places in between.

Thank you


Jim Davis Spiorad an Dúlra http://jimmy-d.smugmug.com
Re: Delicate Arch at Starlight [Re: JimmyD] #13955
03/20/08 05:35 PM
03/20/08 05:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Manhattan, New York, New York
James Morrissey Offline
I
James Morrissey  Offline
I
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2005
Manhattan, New York, New York
Hey Jim,

Thanks for sharing. Would you mind sharing the technique you used to paint the arches? You did a very even job of it. Given the high ISO, it looks surprisingly clean. Does it look that way on the full sized print?

James

Re: Delicate Arch at Starlight [Re: James Morrissey] #13956
03/20/08 06:10 PM
03/20/08 06:10 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Ontario Canada
JimmyD Offline OP
Tracker
JimmyD  Offline OP
Tracker

Joined: Mar 2008
Ontario Canada
James

We experimented first using a flash from multiple angles up to 4 different bursts, we found this tough given the size of the arch and need to run around an block the flash head from getting in the shot, we also found that is was overexposing too much even at lower flash settings. then we tried our head lamps but we found we did not have enough power to do the whole arch evenly. in the end we settle on one main flash burst straight on from farther away and a another from the left side.

I am not totally happy with what we got but it's was a good experiment. The top of the arch needs more exposure which I will tweak later and work on the colour balance, I have not printed it yet but at full resolution it looks much better. For 1250 ISO I am quit impressed over all. My friend was shooting with the Canon EOS 1DS Mark II at the same ISO and he was blown away with the the images from the D300.

Thank you


Jim Davis Spiorad an Dúlra http://jimmy-d.smugmug.com

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 1,567 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Susitna Sled Dog, David Vitor, CTiefisher, DrSuse BlueDevil, airphotog
3319 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums6
Topics635
Posts1,014
Members3,319
Most Online3,015
Sep 23rd, 2025

Copyright �2005 - 2020 Nature, Wildlife, and Pet Photography Forum. "NWPPhotoforum" and "nwpphotoforum.com" are the property of Nature, Wildlife, and Pet Photography Forum. All Rights Reserved. Wild Coyote Studio, New York Pet Photographer

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 5.6.40-1+hw4 Page Time: 0.042s Queries: 15 (0.027s) Memory: 0.9245 MB (Peak: 1.9725 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-10-18 19:27:56 UTC