Re: First Photo Post
[Re: daveman]
#17985
10/12/08 03:57 AM
10/12/08 03:57 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Maine, USA
dlc
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2008
Maine, USA
|
Thank you for taking the time to view the shot and give your opinion.
You say that you don't know the F-stop used, that makes two of us! This shot, taken days after getting the camera, was for a minute or two, a great shot. I barely knew how to turn the camera on. If I remember correctly, everything was on AUTO.
Now looking at it I see what you see. I try to save the bad and not so bad shots to remind myself what not to repeat. Although, sometimes that only works in theory. I have seen improvement but nothing earth shattering or anything to write home about.
I may not know how to correct the situation for the next shot but knowing what is wrong is half the battle. In this particular shot, I regret it being centered. I agree with you on depth of field but when the shot was taken, depth of field meant how far back does the corn grow.
I like the eye-catching yellow, but if you look at it long enough, you want some of your eye back. It is just too yellow. I didn't do PP on this, wanted to leave it warts and all to hopefully learn from it.
|
|
|
Re: First Photo Post
[Re: dlc]
#17986
10/14/08 11:50 AM
10/14/08 11:50 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
glamson
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2006
Donner Summit, CA
|
Quote:
Thank you for taking the time to view the shot and give your opinion.
You say that you don't know the F-stop used, that makes two of us! This shot, taken days after getting the camera, was for a minute or two, a great shot. I barely knew how to turn the camera on. If I remember correctly, everything was on AUTO.
Debbie,
The great thing about modern DSLRs like the E510 is that most of the shooting info is stored in the metadata, EXIF and IPTC. Just about any viewing program these days gives you access to this data. Below is all the EXIF data from your shot displayed in Opanda's IEXIF program. This is a free download that allows you to right click on a web image and display the EXIF data. As you can see you were shooting at f/5.6 which explains the shallow DOF.
Quote:
Now looking at it I see what you see. I try to save the bad and not so bad shots to remind myself what not to repeat. Although, sometimes that only works in theory. I have seen improvement but nothing earth shattering or anything to write home about.
I may not know how to correct the situation for the next shot but knowing what is wrong is half the battle. In this particular shot, I regret it being centered. I agree with you on depth of field but when the shot was taken, depth of field meant how far back does the corn grow.
I like the eye-catching yellow, but if you look at it long enough, you want some of your eye back. It is just too yellow. I didn't do PP on this, wanted to leave it warts and all to hopefully learn from it.
BTW: I agree with Dave's eval of this pic. This is a pretty good capture considering your inexperience with the camera and not using a true macro lens. I do a fair amount of bug shooting and the trick at the close distances you usually have to shoot them at is getting the whole bug in sharp focus. I think this image could have done with a little more sharpening in post processing. You can check out some of my bugs at
http://lamson.zenfolio.com/p573664752/
Thanks for posting.
Geo

|
|
|
Re: First Photo Post
[Re: glamson]
#17987
10/14/08 03:33 PM
10/14/08 03:33 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Sacramento, CA, USA
gengiant
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2007
Sacramento, CA, USA
|
Hi Debbie,
Thanks for sharing! Butterflies make for great macro subject matter, but can be a real challenge without dedicated macro gear.
Looking first at your image and then seeing the EXIF data posted by George, it's pretty clear what's "wrong" with your image. Your camera's "sharpness" setting was set to "soft" and your f-stop set way too shallow at f5.6 - simply a function of the "auto" setting of your camera (on my screen the face of the butterfly is actually rather 'soft', seemingly a bit out of focus). Macro work absolutely requires "critical focus" and sharpness. Depth of field is more a function of your creativity - some images may employ a rather shallow depth of field to "highlight" a certain portion of the images, while others may call for much greater depth of field. I would thus shoot either in aperature priority mode or in manual for macro work. Your camera may even have a dedicated "macro mode".
Your overall composition is pretty good, especially since you did not crop the picture so tight as to not leave any room for post-processing/editing in PS.
Regards,
Holger
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
994
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums6
Topics635
Posts1,014
Members3,319
|
Most Online3,015 Sep 23rd, 2025
|
|
|