Quote:

"... since photography is the art of capturing images with light..."




Thank you!
So this mean non of the pictures which was manipulated in computer should call photo, because many of the details/features wasn't captured/created by lights! Many of the feature on a manipulated picture was calculated and drew by a computer softwere not created by lights.


Also if we follow the same logic what you follow to make the scannography equal with photography, all the pictures was created with pigmented liquid such as paint or ink, must call painting!
So If I print a picture using computer and printer, actually I am a painter. And there is no different what so ever between oil painting and watercolor. Am I right?

But let's go deeper! If everything is photography when a lights created a picture, everything is must be same what was created by a free hand of the artist! So painting and drawing is same too! Now the question is, we should to call a painting as drawing or we should to call a drawing as painting? Why we call them on different name if in both case the artist create the picture by hand?

Because they are different as much as the scannography differ from photography, or as the computer graphic differ from photography. They have similarities, but yet completly different things.

I shoot on Fuji Velvia and Astia, with Nikon F6 and Pentax Z1p with Sigma zoom lenses.