So you think the painters should to throw away all the bruss and paint they still use, and should to develop some afficient fast and easy to use computer controlled techology wich replace all the skill, all the hand work, so who can't even draw nor a stickman, finaly can be a painter artist?
Or the real talented painters should use a brush, a paint, all the skill, and everything, but we should give a chance for the retarted, to became a popular even famous painter, not having a talent but having the techology, what help them to pose as a talented painter?

That is what you try to say?
And what about the real talents, if everything is replaced by computer?
Who is cheat can succeed, who is honest and real talent starwe to death?
Interesting thinking!

If you was a pro and skilled photographer for 40 years, you should to able to capture an artistic picture without the help of the computer.
Before computer manipulated digital pictures, there was many artistic photo! Or they are worth nothing, they are a garbage now? All the Wildlife photographers of the year who won with slides (not prints) was able to do artistic pictures without computer manipulation. Why suddenly we can't live without it? Or just the talent is missing and need something to replace it?
And again, I have no problem with all the digital art and manipulation, and etc. I have pronblem with calling them photography, wich make the viewers cunfused.

If you buy something what was made in a factory, you accept it was made by modern technology. But if you buy a piece of art, you expect it was really crafted! If it wasn't you are victim of a swindle.
I wouldn't pay more money for something what was made in an easy way as everyone can do it!